I have updated the section The Question that won't go away because I should have been clear that it was unverified. It has never been denied either however and it's not just one voice that has said this on social media. My bad.
I am not sure what you mean about notice serve on this case which bans all press from reporting on it. Not true. It’s a choice the MSM have made The BBC are not even attending the trial. But the media are as much a part of what is being done against us as the govt is. Why? We may never really know. But my last article actually covers the trial: https://www.insidebritain.net/p/the-starmer-arson-trial-no-one-is
Great article - it is not the only question mark hanging over the Prime Minister's private life - there are also rumours around Westminster about the true shape of his family but none of this is ever covered by any of the main stream media outlets - it's a very murky business indeed.
He has a secret family - kids with another woman. I can say that with certainty. Birth certificates have been verified But there is a super injunction over it no one can report it
It looks like we would need a brave MP using parliamentary privilege to make the disclosure then - or the public will never be made aware - even though everyone in the Westminster bubble knows - it’s shameful….
Yes and if the kids are still kids then I think the question will always be asked is if it is in the publics interest to know. And it would be hard to make the argument that it is when it is his private life. It doesn't affect him doing his job. Everything else apparently does 🤣 but not that.
I disagree. I really think country leaders have to have some transparency about their private lives. The Rent Boys on trial for example. If Keir is actually gay using male prostitutes that is a national security issue. If my local MP uses prostitutes it is between him and his wife. It isn’t if he sits on the Intel Committee though.
But the media lapped up the salacious gossip about Boris's kids. I don't remember anyone then saying none of it mattered. It was rather used as a demonstration of his character, and not in a good way. Starmer should feel the same heat
How would Starmer paths cross in first place, hardly unlikely to be in same circle unless its a certain sort of circle. How would they know where the location of his house or the flat owned by him was.
It will all come out in the wash, and your excellent article really hits the nail on the head about the dispicable press not covering it, the shameless main stream media complicit in covering up what the powers that be have decided we shouldn’t hear. We will hear it and chime in as we see fit! Bravo, yet another excellent commentary concerning the absurdity that abounds.
It is almost unbelievable that they can get away with this. They work for us, they are our servants, yet it seems like they take the attitude, when it suits them, of " Don't tell the children".
Who do you know of who’s in there who’s not covered by the “regulator”? Asking because exposing a persons sexuality would definitely be covered under IPSA . Either way the judge only has to order it and threaten contempt and we’ve a Tommy type situation.
Who knows with the arm long list of court restrictions we have nowadays AND don’t forget the ones the tool in media called for on themselves and signed up for voluntarily.
Very interesting. I disagree with you about the media's treatment of Boris Johnson, however. Remember when he was Foreign Secretary, he slipped his security detail and went to Tuscany to party all weekend with the Lebedevs (KGB)? This went unreported by the mainstream media. He was snapped at Perugia airport on his way home looking dishevelled and hungover. The only paper that printed the picture, as I recall, was the Metro. As soon as he became PM he elevated Evgeny Lebedev to the House of Lords. So you have a man whose father was KGB sitting in parliament. It was widely under-reported that MI6 refused to fully brief him when he was Foreign Secretary, because he was a security risk. The media might have feasted on the Johnson clown show, but they didn't report the *really* dodgy stuff.
I have updated the section The Question that won't go away because I should have been clear that it was unverified. It has never been denied either however and it's not just one voice that has said this on social media. My bad.
I’d like to know why and notice served on this case which bans all press from reporting on it 🤔
I am not sure what you mean about notice serve on this case which bans all press from reporting on it. Not true. It’s a choice the MSM have made The BBC are not even attending the trial. But the media are as much a part of what is being done against us as the govt is. Why? We may never really know. But my last article actually covers the trial: https://www.insidebritain.net/p/the-starmer-arson-trial-no-one-is
‘My bad’! Puke inducing!!
Great article - it is not the only question mark hanging over the Prime Minister's private life - there are also rumours around Westminster about the true shape of his family but none of this is ever covered by any of the main stream media outlets - it's a very murky business indeed.
He has a secret family - kids with another woman. I can say that with certainty. Birth certificates have been verified But there is a super injunction over it no one can report it
It looks like we would need a brave MP using parliamentary privilege to make the disclosure then - or the public will never be made aware - even though everyone in the Westminster bubble knows - it’s shameful….
Yes and if the kids are still kids then I think the question will always be asked is if it is in the publics interest to know. And it would be hard to make the argument that it is when it is his private life. It doesn't affect him doing his job. Everything else apparently does 🤣 but not that.
Funny how the hounding of Boris over his private life WAS in the public interest, but Starmer is entitled to a private life no questions asked.
Oh yes the left is treated completely differently Same in the USA with Trump and Biden
When it’s a pattern globally you know it is organised
You don’t have to know the kids names or where they live. But the public has a right to know he has other kids.
No they don’t.
I disagree. I really think country leaders have to have some transparency about their private lives. The Rent Boys on trial for example. If Keir is actually gay using male prostitutes that is a national security issue. If my local MP uses prostitutes it is between him and his wife. It isn’t if he sits on the Intel Committee though.
But the media lapped up the salacious gossip about Boris's kids. I don't remember anyone then saying none of it mattered. It was rather used as a demonstration of his character, and not in a good way. Starmer should feel the same heat
you do. What more do you want to know?
Continuation of the "blood line", there's a lot of it around.
How would Starmer paths cross in first place, hardly unlikely to be in same circle unless its a certain sort of circle. How would they know where the location of his house or the flat owned by him was.
It is all very strange for sure!
It will all come out in the wash, and your excellent article really hits the nail on the head about the dispicable press not covering it, the shameless main stream media complicit in covering up what the powers that be have decided we shouldn’t hear. We will hear it and chime in as we see fit! Bravo, yet another excellent commentary concerning the absurdity that abounds.
Thank you, I appreciate your comment
And PS, the card game story is a real hoot, the tell is that nobody is asking details, which they would normally, as you pointed out!
Enquiring minds need to know 🤣
The last part is important: a jury will assess the case. HMG is trying to reduce jury trials, which will lead to more cover up of the truth.
The most senior public prosecutioner has some strange friends.
Isn’t that the truth!
It is almost unbelievable that they can get away with this. They work for us, they are our servants, yet it seems like they take the attitude, when it suits them, of " Don't tell the children".
So were they playing strip poker or was it truth or dare.... ?
Is there a super injunction on this whole case??
I haven't read that at all. And there were some Independent journalists there today, so would that be a no to that question?
Strip poker?
It screams reporting restrictions doesn’t it?
Not when independent journalists were in the courtroom.
Who do you know of who’s in there who’s not covered by the “regulator”? Asking because exposing a persons sexuality would definitely be covered under IPSA . Either way the judge only has to order it and threaten contempt and we’ve a Tommy type situation.
Who knows with the arm long list of court restrictions we have nowadays AND don’t forget the ones the tool in media called for on themselves and signed up for voluntarily.
Very interesting. I disagree with you about the media's treatment of Boris Johnson, however. Remember when he was Foreign Secretary, he slipped his security detail and went to Tuscany to party all weekend with the Lebedevs (KGB)? This went unreported by the mainstream media. He was snapped at Perugia airport on his way home looking dishevelled and hungover. The only paper that printed the picture, as I recall, was the Metro. As soon as he became PM he elevated Evgeny Lebedev to the House of Lords. So you have a man whose father was KGB sitting in parliament. It was widely under-reported that MI6 refused to fully brief him when he was Foreign Secretary, because he was a security risk. The media might have feasted on the Johnson clown show, but they didn't report the *really* dodgy stuff.
Quite extraordinary.
( ! ) 🍆
I too have commented upon X, and complimented Inside britain at the same time
Am I following you back on X?
Thank you. With various user names I probably are unaware but thanks
What were the forfeits at this game of strip poker?🤷♂️